“I was meant to do this”.
I admit that over the past few summers my lunchtime entertainment has been watching the television show America’s Got Talent. One of the things I have observed after seeing hundreds of hopefuls perform is a recurring sentiment, the claim that “I was meant to do this.”
This reveals something interesting to me about people. That is that most people at the end of the day do not have any problem with an impersonal, sovereign force. Fate, if you will. People talk about existing for a purpose when their worldview would affirm that they really have no purpose. They deny the existence of God or at least they deny the idea of a God who is sovereign and “works all things according to the counsel of his will” (Eph. 1:11). Yet, when they reach their goals they are eager to attribute their success to some deterministic “meaning” for their life.
Despite this almost innate openness to the idea of fate, even many so-called Christians reject and are downright offended by a God who determines their destiny. But if not God then what? A materialistic universe has no plan to execute. So tell me, if you were meant to do something, then who meant it? If you believe there is a God who has “a plan for your life”, then how will he bring it about? Who formed you with your skills and talents?
What this shows us is that when people speak of how unthinkable the idea is that God is sovereign over everything, their problem isn’t with determinism, but with the person behind it. People have no problem with the idea of something setting the course of their lives. People make determinism out to be the big issue, but it isn’t the big issue. They aren’t troubled with the logic of how free choice interacts with “destiny” when they step on the stage or when their fate hands them their dreams. The problem they have is not an impersonal, determining force – but a personal one. A being that chooses their destiny for them – and not always the destiny they want.
The problem people have with a divine sovereign is because “Although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.” (Romans 1:21 ESV) People embrace the idea of fate, but put God as the power behind the fate and they deny it. This is because in our sin we do not “honor him as God”, instead we bring him down to our level. And who wants an equal determining their destiny? A friend can’t even tell me what to do!
There is a selfishness behind this that is clear. For when people’s dreams come true they say “I was meant to do this” or “I feel this is why I am on earth.” But when our dreams crash and burn we turn to the God we ignore and ask “why?” or we simply say “This isn’t how life was supposed to go.” So in our sin and self-idolatry what we want is an impersonal force choosing a brilliant destiny for us where we are successful and happy – where we are a god. We want a universe that serves us as god, rather than seeing ourselves as part of a universe that was made to serve God.
Christians do this as well. I meet so many Christians who despise “Calvinism” and by that they mean the idea of total sovereignty, yet when facing the unknown they take comfort that God “has a plan” for them. But when things go bad they don’t respond with “The Lord gives and the Lord takes away” instead they either ask, “God, why would you let this happen?” or if they are more spiritual, yet want to retain their best-buddy view of God they say, “The devil did this”.
A charge sometimes brought against the total sovereignty of God by Christians is that this belief leads to passiveness in our Christian lives. In response to that charge it should be noted that even those that deny God and are pursuing their “destiny” actually use their belief in an impersonal, sovereign force as an impetus to pursue their dreams. They pursue their dream because they believe it is their destiny to reach their goal. Likewise, as a Christian my destiny is to be conformed into the image of Christ, that is the goal. The knowledge of that, if I have a new heart, should be a sufficient impetus to pursue what I was “meant to do”. To labor to the end that I would reach my destiny! If that logic works with wanna’be pop-stars, why not with us as well who have the promises of God to boot?
I know this is a very scattered post, so let me condense my point. People don’t have a problem with sovereignty, they have a problem with a sovereign God. Why? Because if they want a God at all, they want one whose plans to coincide with theirs. Today our rejection of God’s sovereignty is a manifestation of our rebellion, as it was for Adam and Eve in the garden when they despised the idea of a God who would choose their destiny for them. It is my desire that many would come to see the folly of their logic, that I would see my own, and that we would honor God as the sovereign God that he is and embrace the destiny he has chosen as good and right, even if understanding it is beyond us.
July 8, 2014 at 6:23 pm
While I agree with what you are saying in part, I think it misses the point somewhat. It may be true that some have a problem with a God who controls everything or anything. But, as an arminian, that is not my issue. If God was exerting total control over every person’s choices, then all your talk of people rejecting God’s sovereignty is meaningless. Rebellion? What rebellion? I can’t rebel in any way, shape or form if God is micro-managing my every decision. If I believe in freewill, it must be that God wants me to believe free will exists.
The question here is not whether God is able to control everything, the question is what kind of God would that make him?
His character, as plainly revealed in scripture, is of a God who wants people to choose him freely.
Does God have a plan for my life? Of course. Do I follow it perfectly even when I sin? Of course not.
“Therefore, as a Christian my destiny is to be conformed into the image of Christ, that knowledge, if I have a new heart, should be a sufficient impetus to pursue what I was “meant to do”.
And I agree. Our destiny is to be conformed into his image.
But, under determinism, our every sin is also his will. And that is not the Jesus I find in scripture.
July 9, 2014 at 9:53 am
Without making a lengthy reply, I want to state that I know the arguments you are making very well. They are the same ones that I used to make. Much of the issue of how God’s sovereignty interacts with my responsibility is a mystery. I am commanded to obey and if I don’t it is my fault, yet God is sovereign. Two realities that are presented in Scripture.
In God’s exercise of sovereignty he is not making your decisions for you, but is ruling over your decisions in a way that brings about his plans impeccably.
God does want us to willingly choose him, but we can’t. We are dead in sin. We are enemies of God. “No one seeks after God”. On and on we could go. God has to take the first step. And if we are to believe salvation is truly not of anything we do, then we must affirm that God is sovereign over it.
“Does God have a plan for my life? Of course. Do I follow it perfectly even when I sin? Of course not.”
In response to that we are talking of two different things. There is God’s hidden will for my life (who I marry, car I drive, tacos I eat, sins I commit, etc… things that are caught up in his sovereign decree.) Then there is God’s revealed will, namely, that I be like Jesus. The later I fail at often as well, the first I never fail at because it isn’t an issue of “walking in it” it is just God unfolding his eternal decrees. And if you think sin isn’t part of that then you need to read Genesis 50, Exodus 14, Acts 4:27-28, Romans 9, etc. How does God decree sin while being innocent of it? I have some ideas, but ultimately he doesn’t tell me that. What I do know is that when I do sin, I am responsible and he is still sovereign.
So is it possible to rebel against God’s sovereignty? Yes, not in the sense that we can foil his decree, but as we live in a world under his sovereign control and we fail to recognize that sovereignty we rebel in our thinking, robbing glory which belongs to him alone. We fail to honor him as the totally sovereign God he has revealed himself to be – even in the mystery of it all.
Thanks for the comment, good things to think about.
July 9, 2014 at 10:02 am
I would also like to note how thankful I am that since God does want me to willingly choose him, by His Spirit he makes that possible. I willingly choose God but it is only because he has “removed the veil” from my eyes and caused me to see the “Gospel of the glory of Christ who is the image of God.” II Cor 4:1-6
July 9, 2014 at 6:47 pm
It’s great that you thank him for removing the veil for you, but this whole concept of God having a secret will means he is not removing the veil for a lot of other poor sinners, by no fault of their own, only by random selection of some and not of others.
Again, I totally agree that people in general, including Christians like to think God is in their success and not their suffering. It would be more accurate, IMO, to say that God is using both success and suffering to bring us closer to him, but that does not mean he decrees the choices that cause either.
If I take Calvinism to it’s logical conclusion, it is impossible for us to even “rebel in our thinking” If I think something false about God, it’s only because God decrees me to think this way under this theology.
The only way the whole story of the Bible makes sense is if free will is a reality.
Anyway, I promised myself that I wouldn’t get involved in any more lengthy debates on this subject, so I’m done and I apologize for getting sucked into this one. God bless and take care.